The State Department replied by flatly refusing to entertain the possibility of leaving.

“At this time, any delegation sent to Iraq would be dedicated to discussing how to best recommit to our strategic partnership—not to discuss troop withdrawal, but our right, appropriate force posture in the Middle East,” said spokeswoman Ortagus.

“There does, however, need to be a conversation between the U.S. and Iraqi governments not just regarding security, but about our financial, economic, and diplomatic partnership,” Ortagus added.

That language struck New York University journalism professor Mohamad Bazzi as an indication that the U.S. is going to demand payment for its continued presence in Iraq.

“The State Department is ignoring Iraq’s request to withdraw U.S. troops—and it expects Iraq and other countries to pay for U.S. forces,” said Bazzi.

According to the Associated Press, Iraq’s Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani was on Friday calling for a united Iraqi front against foreign intervention.

“The serious attacks and repeated violations of Iraqi sovereignty that occurred in recent days with the apparent weakness of the concerned authorities in protecting the country and its people … are part of the repercussions of the current crisis,” said al-Sistani. 

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.