Menu
  • Home
  • Hydro Flask Limited Edition
  • NRL Rugby Shop
  • Football Kit
  • rio de janeiro loja futebol
SportsNewsForYou

Refugee and migrant arrivals in the EU in 2016: who are we talking about?

Posted on March 27, 2019

Greek coast guard officer tries to calm Syrians who are part of the the largest refugee flow the continent has seen since World War II.Thanassis Stavrakis / Press Association. All rights reserved. The refugee
and migrant crisis is a highly sensitive political topic in the European
Union. Commentators use different terminologies. Many European media outlets, politicians and officials argue that
many (or most) migrants who are arriving in Europe are actually economic
migrants, rather than refugees requiring international protection. According to
this line of thought, it is more accurate to talk about ‘mixed flows’ rather
than flows of refugees.

While it is
correct to say that not all migrants are refugees, data of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
show that 82% of the arrivals by sea to the EU in 2016 come from the world’s
top-10 ‘refugee producing countries’. Nearly half of 172,945 people who reached
the EU by sea from 1 January until early April 2016 come from Syria, another
23% from Afghanistan and 14% from Iraq. Children make up 35% of the total and
women another 20%. As the UNHCR claims, ‘the vast majority of those attempting
this dangerous crossing are in need of international protection, fleeing war,
violence and persecution in their country of origin’.

Arguments
highlighting that current migrant flows in the Mediterranean are ‘mixed’,
without further qualification, oversimplify an issue that is overwhelmingly
humanitarian. Different sources of data, such as the number of asylum permits
granted by national authorities, may be quoted in support of claims that the
percentage of economic migrants is higher than that which can be derived from
UNHCR analyses. However, we can reasonably presume that the UNHCR receives less
political pressure than national immigration authorities when assessing the
nature of the phenomenon.

National immigration authorities in the EU are more
likely to be affected by the policies of the respective national governments,
which are now focusing more on curbing the influx of migrants and refugees
rather than on humanitarian considerations. Evidence of this focus is provided
by the deal that the EU and its member states have made with authoritarian Turkey
to curb migration flows, regardless of the fact that Turkey is not a safe country of
asylum for refugees from Syria,
Iraq, Afghanistan, and other non-European countries.

Furthermore,
sweeping references to migrant flows as being made up of ‘illegal’ migrants –
another refrain of mainstream European politicians, officials and commentators –
misses the point of the need to seek international protection. The 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees recognizes that people may have to enter a country where they seek
protection illegally and should not be penalized for this. UNHCR data shows that
most of the people in question are highly likely to be in need of international
protection, hence it is beside the point to label them on the basis of how they
arrive to Europe.

Following
the terrorist attacks in Paris, it has become fashionable to portray migrants
as a security threat, despite the fact that most perpetrators of the Paris
attacks were EU citizens and had already lived on EU territory for years. Willingly or unwillingly, this thinking conveys the idea that a
terrorist, or at least a security threat, may be hidden behind every migrant.
Besides being grossly incorrect, this approach plays into the hands of extremists
who are eager to describe the current crisis exclusively as a security issue.
It also serves the purposes of external actors who presumably want to use
migrants as a ‘weapon’ to destabilise the EU.

A
thoughtful analysis should deconstruct narratives portraying migrants as a
‘weapon’ and identify them for what they are: people looking for international
protection or, at most, better living conditions. Moreover, it is
important to stress that – as Europol Director Rob Wainwright
argued in February 2016 – “There are
no concrete indications that terrorists are systematically using the stream of
refugees to come into Europe undetected”. An informed view will also
acknowledge the responsibility that many EU member states carry for causing or contributing
to the destabilisation of the countries of origin of the refugees. This applies
both to the ‘recent’ wars fought by some European countries (i.e. in Iraq from
2003, in Libya in 2011) and to the heavy, long-term heritage of colonialism and post-colonial
policy.

There may
be many reasons why media, officials and politicians stress the security
implications of the current crisis and the alleged economic motivations of
migrants. Some politicians may want to easily gain electoral support by stirring
up fear. Similarly, some media are keen on playing the ‘fear card’ in order to
draw a broader audience. Furthermore, some security officials may be eager to
channel the debate in ways that highlight the merits and role of their
institution, or have an ‘over-securitised’ perspective because of their
professional focus. While it is important to hear different opinions and
sources of information, it is even more important to subject them to scrutiny
based on the most reliable data and debunk the increasing trend of securitising
humanitarian and migration issues.

Recent Posts

  • High-Speed QSFP-DD Cable Solutions for Next-Generation Data Centers
  • Optical Attenuator: Principles and Applications
  • How is Dew Point Calculated?
  • **How Is Dew Point Calculated**
  • Light Detector Sensor: A Comprehensive Guide

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • March 2019

    Categories

    • Football News
    • News
    • Read

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2025 SportsNewsForYou | WordPress Theme by Superb WordPress Themes
    Menu
    • Home
    • Hydro Flask Limited Edition
    • NRL Rugby Shop
    • Football Kit
    • rio de janeiro loja futebol